A study that was recently published in Psychology & Health finds evidence suggesting that a technique called mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII) could help those who struggle with bedtime procrastination, a phenomenon where people unnecessarily delay going to bed, especially when they know that doing so is bad for them.
This technique involves combining two self-regulation strategies:
- Mental contrasting. Mental contrasting is a self-regulation strategy where people “first name an important wish (e.g. getting to bed on time) and then identity and mentally elaborate the best outcome (e.g. feeling well-rested). They then identify and vividly imagine a central inner obstacle to reaching that future (e.g. the urge to keep watching videos on the internet)”.
- Implementation intentions. Implementation intentions is a self-regulation strategy that involves forming “if-then plans” for the future, by detailing “when, where and how a goal intention (‘I intend to get to bed on time’) should be executed (‘If it is 11:00pm, then I will stop with whatever I am involved with and get ready for bed!’)”.
The researchers tested the effectiveness of this technique in the context of procrastination in two randomized trials.
In the first trial, two groups of students (N = 510) were designated to receive either a positive-thinking intervention, or an MCII intervention, both of which were designed to help the participants deal with their bedtime procrastination.
The positive-thinking intervention, which served as a control in the study, involved asking the participants to first think of positive outcomes that would result from going to sleep on time, and then form if-then statements based on those positive outcomes, and based on how the participant would feel as a result of them (e.g. ‘If [positive outcome] happens then I will feel [X]!’)
On the other hand, the MCII intervention was implemented as follows:
“First, participants wrote down a feasible wish about getting to bed on time.
Then they wrote down the most positive outcome of realising this wish as well as events and experiences related to that positive outcome.
Then in a third step they had to envision a critical personal and internal obstacle standing in the way of attaining that wish, followed by an elaboration of the events and experiences they associated with it.
Finally, in a fourth step participants formed implementation intentions by answering two questions: ‘When and where will the obstacle occur next?’ and ‘What can I do to overcome the obstacle?’ They were then asked to link the two answers in terms of an if-then statement: If I encounter X, then I will perform Y!”
For both types of interventions, participants were encouraged to use the technique that they were taught on a daily basis. Measurements of relevant variables were taken via questionnaires delivered before the intervention, after the intervention, and 3 weeks later.
The results show that, compared to the control, the MCII intervention helped participants in two main ways. First, it increased their commitment to reducing bedtime procrastination, both immediately after the intervention and 3 weeks later. Second, the MCII intervention led to reduced bedtime discrepancy, which is the difference between when participants intended to go to sleep and when they ended up going to sleep in reality, as measured during the 3 weeks following the intervention.
In addition, participants also reported lower levels of subjective bedtime procrastination after the intervention compared to before it, though there was no statistically significant difference between the two types of interventions based on this measure.
Similar results were found in the follow-up trial, which again involved two groups of students (N=250), and where the performance of the MCII intervention was compared to an intervention where participants were given tips on sleep hygiene.
However, while these results do suggest that MCII can be beneficial in dealing with bedtime procrastination, the findings also point out a notable limitation of this technique:
“Despite reducing discrepancy scores between planned bedtime and actual bedtime, participants did not actually get significantly more sleep, go to bed significantly earlier or wake up significantly later. Thus, it appears that the discrepancy reduction primarily emerged from individuals’ revising their intended bedtimes. The fact that our participants did not sleep more or better is surprising. Apparently, participants in the MCII condition realised that their set bedtimes were unrealistic, thus leading them to revise planned bedtimes, rather than getting to bed earlier.”
This is important, and should be taken into account by those who plan to use this technique. Specifically, it suggests that while the MCII technique might be useful for some people, it will likely not be able to solve the problem of bedtime procrastination for everyone.
Nevertheless, the research does suggest that MCII can benefit some of the people who struggle with bedtime procrastination, and might also be a beneficial tool when it comes to procrastination in general. A notable advantage of this technique lies in the fact that it’s relatively easy to implement and involves little risk, so it could be worthwhile to at least give this technique a try, and see whether it works for you.
If you find that this technique is unhelpful or insufficient in your case, then you should consider using additional anti-procrastination techniques in order to deal with your bedtime procrastination. This can involve, for example, establishing a consistent routine, gamifying your behavior, improving your sleep environment, or using nudges.
Summary and main takeaways
- Bedtime procrastination is a phenomenon where people go to sleep later than they intended, without any legitimate reason for the delay.
- The present study suggests that the MCII technique, which combines mental contrasting with implementation intentions, could help some people reduce their bedtime procrastination.
- To use this technique, you should first write down a feasible wish (in this case going to bed on time), followed by writing the most positive outcome of fulfilling this wish, together with the events and experiences which relate to it.
- Then, envision a critical personal obstacle standing in the way of attaining that wish, and elaborate on the events and experiences associated with that obstacle.
- Finally, identify both when and where you are likely to encounter this obstacle and what you can do to overcome it, using ‘if-then statements’, such as ‘if X happens, then I will do Y’.
You might also be interested in:
- Why People Procrastinate: The Psychology and Causes of Procrastination
- Procrastinator: A Guide to Understanding the People Who Procrastinate
- How to Stop Procrastinating: A Guide for People Who Want to Overcome Procrastination and Start Getting Things Done